Will raising the age for required withdrawals from your retirement accounts make a difference? | | | WED, JUN 12, 2019 | | | So, you may be wondering: What is this Secure Act and why does it matter to me?
The Secure Act, which passed the House and awaits action in the Senate, aims to improve the nation's retirement system. In fact, if passed, the bill would be the biggest legislative change to the retirement system in more than a decade, when the Pension Protection Act was passed in 2006.
It includes 29 provisions, many of which provide new opportunities to save. One change, for instance, raises the age requirement for a required minimum distributions to 72, from 70½. Another allows annuities to be offered in 401(k) plans. Outside of the retirement space, the bill provides opportunities to save elsewhere, by increasing flexibility in covering costs associated with education and adoption.
However, while the bill encourages more people to save, pundits say it doesn't address other issues surrounding retirement, such as rising health-care costs and Social Security insolvency.
Because the legislation would create many new options for retirement savings, it does increase the importance of educating yourself on all of the options at your disposal, according to some advisors I spoke with about the bill. While we await possible passage, these advisors say it's a good time for everyone to review their current retirement plan and find a strategy to possibly increase their contributions.
For more cool stuff like this, please follow me on Twitter @jimpavia and check out CNBC's Financial Advisor Hub and CNBC + Acorns Invest in You: Ready. Set. Grow. | Here's why advisors may urge retirees to load up on equities | Guaranteed income — whether in the form of Social Security, pensions or income annuities — offers retiring investors an extra measure of safety from market shocks. Income they can count on also gives them the flexibility to invest a little more aggressively. | | | Trump on the Fed: They're disruptive | "Trump complains that the people voting on the Fed's board are 'not my people' – I'm not sure the Fed is supposed to be subordinate to the President ..." | | |
Post a Comment