Hey friends, I am back in your inbox in the middle of an unscheduled summer break. I'll drop another newsletter or two on you this week before taking next week off someplace where I hope Wi-Fi cannot reach. Then we'll get back to our regularly irregular cadence of tech news again in August. As always, I'm grateful you've subscribed and apologies for dropping off so suddenly. Today I've been thinking about how so much of the action in Android phones is happening in the midrange. Obviously that's because OnePlus just unveiled the Nord smartphone, with a 90Hz display, dual selfie cameras, and 5G. Here's Jon Porter: If offering similar specs to the OnePlus 8 in a midrange phone sounds like a recipe for stealing some of the 8's thunder, then you wouldn't be entirely wrong. In fact, OnePlus co-founder Carl Pei told me that's almost the point. Although he says the two phones are targeting different markets, he doesn't want the company to be afraid of competing with itself. It won't be making it to the US in any real numbers (yet), but there is not a ton of daylight between it and the OnePlus 8. Wait for the Nord to be scored in Porter's full review — coming soon — but it seems like a solid phone based just on the specs. It's also one of a few phones that I've been waiting for since December, as it uses the less-expensive Snapdragon 765G processor. There's also LG's stylish midrange Velvet phone, which launches in the US on July 22nd. Sam Byford reviewed the Korean version, which has a slightly different processor from the same series. My hope last December was that this processor would be fast enough for the vast majority of people, which could mean that vast majority wouldn't have to compromise so much when spending less than $700 or so on a phone. Byford's review doesn't give me a ton of hope: Apps load quickly, web pages render as expected, games run fine, and so on. But the Velvet still somehow feels slow, whether it's the 60Hz display or the stuttery scrolling in certain apps. I don't know if it's the chip itself or LG's software, but it doesn't match up to other 2020 flagship Android phones. Dip below "mid range" and you get into territory with phones like the Samsung A51 I reviewed this past May. It has Samsung's own Exynos processor and I noticed a distinct slowness there too. In a world where the iPhone SE runs $399 with an absolutely blazing processor, Android phones are at a distinct disadvantage in that department. There are still places where Android phones are stronger than the iPhone SE, of course, but it's just not easy to choose. (Also, someday, hopefully, maybe, whatever Google will finally announce a Pixel 4A with an entirely other rumored chip in it.) Anyway, when I say "all the action" is in this price range, what I mean is that there seems to be a lot more experimentation, mixing and matching of components, and differentiation. Everything over a thousand bucks is flat out trying to give you the bestest and mostest, so choosing a phone is relatively simple. (Let's set aside foldables for now.) But down here in the more reasonable range you sort of have to be more savvy about what you want. Do you care about screen size? Screen quality? Battery life? Camera? Speed? Gaming performance? The truth is that unless you veer into flagship territory, you have to pick one or a few of those things — you can't have it all. |
Post a Comment